Letter to Boris Johnson
February 25, 2010
Dear Mr Johnson
Re: Willesden Junction Tube Station
I am writing to you regarding the tube station outlined above and to complain to you about the lack of commitment by the councils and Network Rail to do anything about the land around Willesden Junction tube station and the road leading up to it.
Willesden Junction is probably the main tube station for the Harlesden area. Although it is about 10 minutes from the centre of Harlesden, it is closer than Harlesden tube station to where all the shops are located. The station is very busy and is also the access point to some parts of the Park Royal industrial area.
Despite the fact that the station is so busy, the area around it has been badly neglected. Not only are there huge amounts of rubbish on the embankment leading to the train tracks, the road (Station Approach) and pavements leading up to Willesden Junction tube station are also badly damaged and urgently need resurfacing (one could argue that they are currently posing a health & safety risk as people do have to step onto the road when it rains, as the puddles are so huge). In addition to that, the whole area around there could do with a bit of TLC – i.e. a school project painting the rather dull fence along the road etc.
Willesden Junction tube station is shared between Hammersmith & Fulham and Brent Council. In addition, there is the added complication that parts of the land supposedly belong to Network Rail. The problem is – nobody is taking the responsibility to do anything about the mess. This has been going on ever since I have lived in the area (3 years) and I believe many years before that. As a resident of London, I now urge you to please do something about this. I feel that the way this is currently being handled is a disgrace and shows how little respect the council and Network Rail have for the residents who live here.
Harlesden is in dire need of some investment and the station is the entry point into the town. How does anyone expect Harlesden to attract any kind of investment, if things look the way they are?
I would be grateful if you could urge your colleagues at Brent and Hammersmith & Fulham Council to take this matter seriously and to work with Network Rail to solve this problem once and for all. The residents of Harlesden should not suffer for the inaction and disinterest that this issue has raised.
I would be happy to meet with you at Willesden Junction tube station, should you wish to meet some of the residents. I look forward to hearing from you.
Kind regards
Minutes from first Town Team meeting
February 22, 2010
MINUTES FROM FIRST TOWN TEAM MEETING:
The first town team meeting for Harlesden
6.30pm to 8.30pm on Monday 08 February
Unity Centre, 103 Church Road, Harlesden
Introduction to Renaissance Towns by Professor Alan Simpson:
The process being introduced to Harlesden has worked throughout the UK and has roots
in the US. The Renaissance Towns process recognises that social and economic visions
and place making strategies must be pursued collaboratively – by the community and for
the community – working with the local authority.
Renaissance Town visions are developed through a series of public and community –
Town Team – meetings and workshops. Events are led by the community and
facilitated by a range of expertise, who provide the skills and resources required to
translate aspirations into adoptable and realisable visions for change. The Town
Team leads the development of the renaissance vision. Expert facilitation skills are
drawn from a variety of sectors, including planning, movement and transport,
community engagement, urban design.
Resulting visions – referred to as Charters – are developed from this process. It is a
process and its scope is, of necessity, ambitious. It invites communities to determine –
within a clear structure and in collaboration with their local authorities – the pathway for
long-term futures. Renaissance – cultural change, innovative, sustainable economic and
community driven – is allied to new infrastructure, built form and an attractive, accessible
and amenable public realm.
The Renaissance Process follows four general steps:
Beginnings:
~Establish community and local authority commitment to the Renaissance process and
the appointment of a Town Team, its advisors and facilitators.
~Town Team:
Recruitment of the Town Team – an open forum of people from the area from all sectors
to explore issues and establish Key Themes. The Town Team is the champion of the
Charter, overseeing its legacy and delivery over the coming years.
~Charrette and Workshops:
Community driven workshops held over two consecutive days to explore and develop
long-term opportunities. This process creates the Charter.
~The Charter:
Sets out 5, 10 and 15 year visions for the Community and its environment. Drawn and
written up by the facilitators, re-presented to the community, agreed, signed, presented
to the local authority and embedded into Council workings.
The Renaissance process is driven by the belief that attractive and accessible – beautiful –
neighbourhoods and communities, towns and cities, attract the visitor, the investor and
the resident. Whilst poor quality environments deter, physically and culturally attractive
‘places’ secure their own long-term social, economic and environmental well being.
Following the introduction to the Renaissance Towns process to be
undertaken in Harlesden, an open session allowed Town Team members to
question and share ideas for the process.
The following are brief points made by individuals in attendance:
1. The following ideas were suggested for the town centre:
- Allow for two-way traffic
- From the clock to the library, remove traffic for parts of the day
- Address parking issues
- Introduce cycle lanes
- Provide better lighting at cash machines
- Create new business incentives to provide a greater retail mix
2. The centre point of Harlesden is a car park, not a civic space. Perhaps make
the car park underground. Introduce cafes and venues for art and music, maybe
using Park House.
3. A long term resident wanted to know if this process was going to lead
somewhere, and what led Harlesden to its current position. Was the community
planned to decline from the Council and others?
4. Another resident expressed their view that the area has gone from good to bad
to worse. The community was consulted in the 1980’s, but the revitalisation never
happened. Today people come to the area just to dump rubbish.
5. Chain shops might add to the mix of businesses, but a lot of people come to
Harlesden because there aren’t chain shops here. Most businesses are locally
owned. We should be careful to maintain the local appeal of the area.
6. Harlesden needs a greater diversity of shops and needs to deal with the empty
shops. The town team process should focus on bringing together the many
communities in Harlesden that live and work beside one another, but often do not
interact with each other. The process also needs to engage with the youth.
7. How can we deal with traffic volumes? Are we tied by existing constraints?
Should we consider a local Harlesden congestion charge?
8. Please bring the nice aspects you see in North Brent to Harlesden.
9. As a recent resident of three years, I have really seen people coming together
over the last year. We should build off this and look at other similar places, such
as Stoke Newington. Also, why not bring in a market to focus on the local food
culture?
10. It would be nice to think about making the space better for pedestrians, like
Oxford Street.
11. Should we consider moving the traffic, maybe through a tunnel?
12. We need to include the key people in Brent, including the top officers to these
meetings.
13. Along Craven Park Road, where the phone booth is in the island, there was a
bench… Put it back!
14. We need the commitment from the younger generation; they need to be
involved and have a sense of ownership.
15. It would be nice to have a public space, maybe with a bandstand to
showcase and to be used by local talent.
16. We need to ensure the planners will listen and participate and be involved in
the process.
17. We should have a small cinema and art space for Harlesden.
18. There is a cultural strategy and it will be launched next month. This should be
included in the process.
19. We should think about the various uses throughout the day, and consider
how we relate them to crime prevention. Also, public transport, pedestrians and
cycling should be given priority. There should be a shift in priority of street users,
like in Brugges.
20. The approach from Willesden Junction road is shabby. It is a gateway to the
town centre and needs to be improved.
21. There is a Facebook page created for anyone who would like to join it called
Keep Harlesden Clean.
22. A blog should be set up to keep those online interested during the process.
23. We need commitment from the Council, why aren’t others here from the
Council?
24. At night the street are empty and dark, and all the shops have roller shades
pulled down. Perhaps there could be competition to paint the shades, with the
youth competing to have their designs selected.
25. Who owns the process, is it Transport for London or Brent Transportation
Service. It is Brent Transportation Service…
26. Should we consider the larger view, including the canal and Stonebridge?
27. The long term is important, but so are improvements in the short term,
including ‘zone H’ parking, addressing the stolen art work and traffic along Tubbs
Road.
28. Where are the traffic wardens? They should be here, so we can find out how
to help them enforce parking.
29. We all need to lobby the charter to realise it and the projects it will contain.
30. The Brent education building in Harlesden will be shut shortly, why not keep it
open and use as an extension of the Library?
The following are comments that were posted on the presentation boards:
1. Hammersmith & Fulham have applied for a Crossrail station for the Kensal
Green area, we should incorporate.
2. Need to address the bottleneck at High Street Harlesden and Park Parade
along with the inconvenient bus stops and HGV traffic.
3. We need more cultural spaces for the arts, movies and local information.
Potential site could be the former ‘BACES house’ or ‘Park House’ that is
owned by the Council or NHS.
4. Reclaim Tavistock – invade and improve
5. Promote ‘Legible London’ through a single style of signage that is
harmonised, clear and concise.
6. Flowers from metal trees: Space unifiers, space identifiers, space
beautifiers.
7. Look at the wider picture: Willesden Junction Station and its
redevelopment as the gateway to NW.
8. Focus on the canal, which is a beautiful thoroughfare and is a useable
community space throughout the day. However, lighting is needed as it
feels uncomfortable at night.
9. Ask TfL to make Willesden Junction Station more beautiful, like Hampsted
Heath station. The current developments seem to be making it even
worse.
10. Sort out both the Harrow Road footpath entrance and main entrance to
Willesden Junction Station.
11. We need something to inspire community pride, like a community-led art
project.
12. Address areas of Craven Park Road that are derelict, move cable boxes,
introduce pavement studs for traders, upgrade all lighting and provide
publicity on loading bays.
13. Camera enforcement for traffic, Remove HCC build-outs, review car
parking zone H, provide a crossing for the Library (see Living Streets
document) and reduce shared parking.
The second Town Team meeting will occur on Monday 1st March from 6.30
to 8.30pm at the Unity Centre, 103 Church Road, Harlesden. Please
encourage fellow residents, colleagues and business owners interested in
the future of Harlesden to join us!
The two-day workshop will be held on Friday 19th March and Saturday 20th March
at the Salvation Army hall at 32 Manor Park Road, Harlesden.
For further information, please contact Scott Adams at Urban Design Skills on
020 7287 4269 or via email: scott@urbandesignskills.com
Urban Design Skills, an urban design consultancy working on behalf of Brent
Council and Transport for London for the Harlesden Town Charter, recorded the
above notes.
